Infinity and Partners Logo
HomeAbout UsArea of PracticeInsightsAttorneysCareers
Join our newsletter to keep up to date with us!
Infinity and Partners Logo
Navigation
HomeAbout UsInsightsAttorneysCareers
Area of Practices
Business LawDispute ResolutionLegal ReformCivil Law
Designed and Developed with Yojana.
© 2024 Infinity and Partners Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of ServicePrivacy Policy
Image

Effect of Foreign Divorce Decree on Property Claims in Nepal

Saturday - Jun 14, 2025 (Updated: Jun 16, 2025)
Legal Update
This legal note examines whether a spouse can claim property partition in Nepal after a foreign divorce, referencing key provisions in the National Civil Code, 2074 and landmark Supreme Court decisions. It explores jurisdiction, recognition of foreign judgments, and the status of property claims during and after international divorce proceedings.
Download Article
Image

Foreign divorce proceedings are becoming increasingly common among Nepali citizens living abroad. This raises important legal questions around whether a spouse, particularly a wife, can claim property partition in Nepal when the divorce case is either pending or concluded in a foreign country. This article explores the legal position under Nepal’s National Civil Code, 2074, recent Supreme Court decisions, and related legal provisions.


Can a Nepali citizen living abroad or a foreign national file a property claim in Nepal?

Yes. According to Section 718(e) of the National Civil Code, Nepalese courts have jurisdiction over immovable and movable property located within Nepal, regardless of the nationality or residence of the involved parties. This means both Nepali citizens and foreigners can bring claims before Nepalese courts for property located in Nepal.


Can a foreign national file or defend a partition of property case in Nepal?

Yes. However, if a foreign citizen obtains property rights in Nepal through partition or succession, certain conditions apply under Section 433 of the Code:

  • The property cannot be registered in their name without government approval.
  • They cannot earn income from the property.
  • A provisional landownership certificate is issued and must be transferred to a Nepali citizen.
  • Failure to transfer ownership results in the property being vested in the Government of Nepal.


Is divorce a pre-condition for claiming partition of property in Nepal?

No. Under Section 213 of the Code, a spouse may claim partition of property due to mistreatment or forced removal from the residence, even without filing for divorce. Moreover, Section 99 clarifies that when divorce is filed, property division must occur before the divorce is finalized. Hence, a partition claim is valid both with and without a divorce petition.


Does Nepal recognize foreign divorce decrees?

Yes, but only under certain conditions as per Section 706 of the Code and the Mutual Legal Assistance Act, 2015. A foreign divorce must be:

  • Final and conclusive
  • Issued by a competent court
  • Not against Nepalese public policy or natural justice

If the decree was obtained through fraud or without fair participation by both parties, it may be denied recognition. This was emphasized in Pushkar Raj Pandey v. Sabina Pandey, where the court rejected a foreign divorce decree because the wife was not given a fair chance to participate.


Can a property partition case be filed in Nepal before a foreign divorce is initiated?

Yes. Since divorce is not required to initiate a partition claim, a spouse can legally claim their share in Nepal even if no foreign divorce petition has been filed.


Can a spouse file for partition in Nepal while a foreign divorce petition is pending?

Yes. As long as the divorce is not finalized, the marital status remains valid under Nepali law, and either spouse can file for partition in Nepal.


What happens if the foreign divorce is finalized during a pending partition case in Nepal?

In Narayan Sapkota v. Pramisha Dawadi, the Supreme Court held that if a partition case is filed in Nepal before the foreign divorce is finalized, it remains valid. The subsequent foreign divorce does not invalidate the pending claim.

This principle was also upheld in earlier cases like Shivaji Khaniya v. Anu Pandey.


Can a spouse claim partition after a foreign divorce is finalized?

If the foreign divorce decree is recognized under Nepali law, the spouses are no longer considered legally married, and spousal property rights may not be claimed. However, this issue remains open to judicial interpretation as there are no binding precedents directly addressing this specific situation yet.

The Mutual Legal Assistance Act generally requires a bilateral agreement between Nepal and the issuing country, but Section 706 allows for recognition if procedural and legal standards are met.


Conclusion

Foreign divorce decrees can affect property partition rights in Nepal, but the law provides several safeguards and pathways for spouses to claim property rights. Recognition depends on compliance with the Civil Code, Mutual Legal Assistance Act, and principles of natural justice. The evolving nature of court decisions in Nepal makes it essential to stay updated on judicial interpretations.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for legal advice. Please consult with a legal professional for guidance specific to your case.


Contributors

  • Profile Image of Narayan Chaulagain

    Narayan Chaulagain
    Managing Partner

  • Profile Image of Alangkrita Upadhayay

    Alangkrita Upadhayay
    Associate

  • Profile Image of Rejina Paudyal

    Rejina Paudyal
    Associate

Practice Areas

practice sprite

Business Law

Infinity & Partners offers comprehensive corporate governance support in Nepal, focusing on corporate compliance, education law, employment law, foreign investment, infrastructure, information technology, intellectual property, private equity, and taxation. Our services include regulatory compliance, legal advisory for educational institutions, foreign investment facilitation, tax dispute management, and guidance for infrastructure projects and private equity ventures.
Learn More
practice sprite

Dispute Resolution

Infinity & Partners provides comprehensive dispute resolution services in Nepal, specializing in both litigation and arbitration across various legal areas, including corporate and constitutional matters. The firm offers expert representation, document preparation, and strategic advocacy for complex disputes in both domestic and international contexts.
Learn More
practice sprite

Legal Reform

Infinity & Partners offers expert legal reform advisory in Nepal, specializing in commercial law, law drafting, policy development, and regulatory alignment with global best practices for government and local authorities.
Learn More
practice sprite

Civil Law

Infinity & Partners offers comprehensive legal services in Nepal, specializing in civil law, family law, and real estate law under the Muluki Civil Code, 2018. Our expertise includes contract disputes, marriage registration, property division, and land acquisition, ensuring clients navigate the legal landscape effectively.
Learn More

Recent Insights

Business Law
Sep 8, 2024
A General Guide to IPO
This IPO guide explains the process and regulations governing Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) in Nepal. It covers eligibility criteria, procedural steps, and key regulatory requirements, including SEBON's role, credit rating, prospectus approval, and mandatory announcements.
Read More
Business Law
Jan 22, 2025
Amendments to the Privatization Act
The Federal Parliament of Nepal is currently not in the session. Consequently, the Government of Nepal has promulgated four Ordinances, which have been approved by the President and published in the Nepal Gazette on Poush 29, 2081 (13 January 2025)
Read More
Dispute resolution / litigation
Oct 28, 2024
Case Analysis: Ramila Devi vs. Nepal Government
This case study explores the Supreme Court’s ruling in Ramila Devi vs. Nepal Government, a pivotal case defining fraud liability in cooperative institutions. The court's decision emphasizes identifying the "controlling mind" responsible for corporate fraud, shifting from previous approaches of collective liability.
Read More